Current Issue
 
Style Wars
 
May 24, 2007: As I’m listening to Steve Reich’s minimalist musings at one of Soundstream’s “Cool Drummings” concerts, I find myself wondering why this blatantly un-modernist style made such a big splash in the United States when it emerged there in the 1970s? And why has it made so small a splash here in Canada?  After the concert, the second question, in particular, stays in the back of my mind for the next few weeks.
 
June 2, 2007: Tonight, the Elgin Theatre is just about packed for the second of three performances of Philip Glass’s and Leonard Cohen’s new work, Book of Longing. It’s nice to see a new audience for new music – but where’s the “old” audience for new music? Scanning the theatre (and also watching people as they exit at the end of the show), I see exactly one person I know, whom I would describe as a regular attendee of contemporary-music concerts in Toronto.
 
This well advertised event – a world premiere by an internationally famous composer – seems to have been shunned by this city’s traditional new-music community. I’m reminded of the first time I heard the Philip Glass Ensemble in Toronto, back in 1980: the concert was punctuated by prominent local composers getting up and walking out.
 
June 14, 2007: I attend a little celebration at the Canadian Music Centre, marking the launch of the CMC’s new website, “Influences of Many Musics.” (The site is quite impressive, by the way: you can find a link to it on the CMC’s main website, at www.musicentre .ca.) Spotting several knowledgeable experts in the crowd, I ask them who Canada’s minimalists are. One suggests the composer Marjan Mozetich – “sort of” – and another points out that Ann Southam acknowledges the influence of the American minimalist Terry Riley. A contemplative silence descends on the small group, and no further names emerge.
 
Then I notice Frank Horvat in the corner. I first met this Toronto composer some years ago, but haven’t seen him for a while. Because Horvat is something of a minimalist, I ask him why the style hasn’t won many adherents here in Canada. Without hesitation, he replies that minimalism “is opposed by the Canadian academic tradition.” He adds that he’ll send me a copy of his latest compact disc.
 
June 25, 2007: As I write these words, I’m listening to Horvat’s CD,  “I’ll Be Good,” a collection of piano works he’s composed and performed. It’s an eclectic mixture of various influences – everything from Steve Reich to Billy Joel – and it sounds very “American” for a Canadian composer. (Space doesn’t permit a full review of the disc here, but I can say that I was most impressed by the haunting exoticism of track 12, entitled “Smokers.”)
 
I’m still wondering what it means that Canadian composers have largely shunned minimalism – and that the few who have taken an interest tend to be marginalized by some movers and shakers in Canada’s “official” contemporary-music community. I’m not saying that minimalism is necessarily better than the European high-modernist tradition: on the contrary, I have problems with the oppressive, obsessive nature of many minimalist scores, and the tendency for some minimalists – Glass, in particular – to repeat themselves from one work to the next.
 
I guess what I’m really getting at is how music, and the teaching of music, can take on the dogmatic aspects of religious or political indoctrination, with certain ideas labeled orthodox, and others heterodox. “We don’t do that here,” said John Weinzweig, during his years as a University of Toronto composition professor, whenever a student brought him a score with a major triad in it. Does anyone really benefit from such efforts to police style?
 


Colin Eatock is a composer and writer in Toronto who contributes to the Globe and Mail and other publications. His T.O. Musical Diary is a regular monthly feature of The WholeNote magazine.



Previous Article
Next Article